The correction document approved has gestation time of two yr. In fact by that time there will be more trouble at home in the kitchen.The credibility issu e will grow wide and tall that the bas will start eroding faster than ever before. Interestingly the growth rate of economy is bond t accelerate the erosion.
Scientifically speaking there is the question of entropy here. It means that every system will have to degenerate and go to a degree of disorder. Even large groups of people follow this principle. So what is urgently needed is to go to the base of the population pyramid and enroll them to cadres so that the base is not lost. Or else it will go the way of other political parties, especially like the CPI.
Monday, October 26, 2009
Thursday, October 22, 2009
When Parents Are Too Toxic to TolerateE
When Parents Are Too Toxic to TolerateE
By RICHARD A. FRIEDMAN, M.D.
Published: October 19, 2009
You can divorce an abusive spouse. You can call it quits if your lover mistreats you. But what can you do if the source of your misery is your own parent?
Granted, no parent is perfect. And whining about parental failure, real or not, is practically an American pastime that keeps the therapeutic community dutifully employed.
But just as there are ordinary good-enough parents who mysteriously produce a difficult child, there are some decent people who have the misfortune of having a truly toxic parent.
A patient of mine, a lovely woman in her 60s whom I treated for depression, recently asked my advice about how to deal with her aging mother.
“She’s always been extremely abusive of me and my siblings,” she said, as I recall. “Once, on my birthday, she left me a message wishing that I get a disease. Can you believe it?”
Over the years, she had tried to have a relationship with her mother, but the encounters were always painful and upsetting; her mother remained harshly critical and demeaning.
Whether her mother was mentally ill, just plain mean or both was unclear, but there was no question that my patient had decided long ago that the only way to deal with her mother was to avoid her at all costs.
Now that her mother was approaching death, she was torn about yet another effort at reconciliation. “I feel I should try,” my patient told me, “but I know she’ll be awful to me.”
Should she visit and perhaps forgive her mother, or protect herself and live with a sense of guilt, however unjustified? Tough call, and clearly not mine to make.
But it did make me wonder about how therapists deal with adult patients who have toxic parents.
The topic gets little, if any, attention in standard textbooks or in the psychiatric literature, perhaps reflecting the common and mistaken notion that adults, unlike children and the elderly, are not vulnerable to such emotional abuse.
All too often, I think, therapists have a bias to salvage relationships, even those that might be harmful to a patient. Instead, it is crucial to be open-minded and to consider whether maintaining the relationship is really healthy and desirable.
Likewise, the assumption that parents are predisposed to love their children unconditionally and protect them from harm is not universally true. I remember one patient, a man in his mid-20s, who came to me for depression and rock-bottom self-esteem.
It didn’t take long to find out why. He had recently come out as gay to his devoutly religious parents, who responded by disowning him. It gets worse: at a subsequent family dinner, his father took him aside and told him it would have been better if he, rather than his younger brother, had died in a car accident several years earlier.
Though terribly hurt and angry, this young man still hoped he could get his parents to accept his sexuality and asked me to meet with the three of them.
The session did not go well. The parents insisted that his “lifestyle” was a grave sin, incompatible with their deeply held religious beliefs. When I tried to explain that the scientific consensus was that he had no more choice about his sexual orientation than the color of his eyes, they were unmoved. They simply could not accept him as he was.
I was stunned by their implacable hostility and convinced that they were a psychological menace to my patient. As such, I had to do something I have never contemplated before in treatment.
At the next session I suggested that for his psychological well-being he might consider, at least for now, forgoing a relationship with his parents.
I felt this was a drastic measure, akin to amputating a gangrenous limb to save a patient’s life. My patient could not escape all the negative feelings and thoughts about himself that he had internalized from his parents. But at least I could protect him from even more psychological harm.
Easier said than done. He accepted my suggestion with sad resignation, though he did make a few efforts to contact them over the next year. They never responded.
Of course, relationships are rarely all good or bad; even the most abusive parents can sometimes be loving, which is why severing a bond should be a tough, and rare, decision.
Dr. Judith Lewis Herman, a trauma expert who is a clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, said she tried to empower patients to take action to protect themselves without giving direct advice.
“Sometimes we consider a paradoxical intervention and say to a patient, ‘I really admire your loyalty to your parents — even at the expense of failing to protect yourself in any way from harm,’ ” Dr. Herman told me in an interview.
The hope is that patients come to see the psychological cost of a harmful relationship and act to change it.
Eventually, my patient made a full recovery from his depression and started dating, though his parents’ absence in his life was never far from his thoughts.
No wonder. Research on early attachment, both in humans and in nonhuman primates, shows that we are hard-wired for bonding — even to those who aren’t very nice to us.
We also know that although prolonged childhood trauma can be toxic to the brain, adults retain the ability later in life to rewire their brains by new experience, including therapy and psychotropic medication.
For example, prolonged stress can kill cells in the hippocampus, a brain area critical for memory. The good news is that adults are able to grow new neurons in this area in the course of normal development. Also, antidepressants encourage the development of new cells in the hippocampus.
It is no stretch, then, to say that having a toxic parent may be harmful to a child’s brain, let alone his feelings. But that damage need not be written in stone.
Of course, we cannot undo history with therapy. But we can help mend brains and minds by removing or reducing stress.
Sometimes, as drastic as it sounds, that means letting go of a toxic parent.
Dr. Richard A. Friedman is a professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College.NYT-10/22/09
By RICHARD A. FRIEDMAN, M.D.
Published: October 19, 2009
You can divorce an abusive spouse. You can call it quits if your lover mistreats you. But what can you do if the source of your misery is your own parent?
Granted, no parent is perfect. And whining about parental failure, real or not, is practically an American pastime that keeps the therapeutic community dutifully employed.
But just as there are ordinary good-enough parents who mysteriously produce a difficult child, there are some decent people who have the misfortune of having a truly toxic parent.
A patient of mine, a lovely woman in her 60s whom I treated for depression, recently asked my advice about how to deal with her aging mother.
“She’s always been extremely abusive of me and my siblings,” she said, as I recall. “Once, on my birthday, she left me a message wishing that I get a disease. Can you believe it?”
Over the years, she had tried to have a relationship with her mother, but the encounters were always painful and upsetting; her mother remained harshly critical and demeaning.
Whether her mother was mentally ill, just plain mean or both was unclear, but there was no question that my patient had decided long ago that the only way to deal with her mother was to avoid her at all costs.
Now that her mother was approaching death, she was torn about yet another effort at reconciliation. “I feel I should try,” my patient told me, “but I know she’ll be awful to me.”
Should she visit and perhaps forgive her mother, or protect herself and live with a sense of guilt, however unjustified? Tough call, and clearly not mine to make.
But it did make me wonder about how therapists deal with adult patients who have toxic parents.
The topic gets little, if any, attention in standard textbooks or in the psychiatric literature, perhaps reflecting the common and mistaken notion that adults, unlike children and the elderly, are not vulnerable to such emotional abuse.
All too often, I think, therapists have a bias to salvage relationships, even those that might be harmful to a patient. Instead, it is crucial to be open-minded and to consider whether maintaining the relationship is really healthy and desirable.
Likewise, the assumption that parents are predisposed to love their children unconditionally and protect them from harm is not universally true. I remember one patient, a man in his mid-20s, who came to me for depression and rock-bottom self-esteem.
It didn’t take long to find out why. He had recently come out as gay to his devoutly religious parents, who responded by disowning him. It gets worse: at a subsequent family dinner, his father took him aside and told him it would have been better if he, rather than his younger brother, had died in a car accident several years earlier.
Though terribly hurt and angry, this young man still hoped he could get his parents to accept his sexuality and asked me to meet with the three of them.
The session did not go well. The parents insisted that his “lifestyle” was a grave sin, incompatible with their deeply held religious beliefs. When I tried to explain that the scientific consensus was that he had no more choice about his sexual orientation than the color of his eyes, they were unmoved. They simply could not accept him as he was.
I was stunned by their implacable hostility and convinced that they were a psychological menace to my patient. As such, I had to do something I have never contemplated before in treatment.
At the next session I suggested that for his psychological well-being he might consider, at least for now, forgoing a relationship with his parents.
I felt this was a drastic measure, akin to amputating a gangrenous limb to save a patient’s life. My patient could not escape all the negative feelings and thoughts about himself that he had internalized from his parents. But at least I could protect him from even more psychological harm.
Easier said than done. He accepted my suggestion with sad resignation, though he did make a few efforts to contact them over the next year. They never responded.
Of course, relationships are rarely all good or bad; even the most abusive parents can sometimes be loving, which is why severing a bond should be a tough, and rare, decision.
Dr. Judith Lewis Herman, a trauma expert who is a clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, said she tried to empower patients to take action to protect themselves without giving direct advice.
“Sometimes we consider a paradoxical intervention and say to a patient, ‘I really admire your loyalty to your parents — even at the expense of failing to protect yourself in any way from harm,’ ” Dr. Herman told me in an interview.
The hope is that patients come to see the psychological cost of a harmful relationship and act to change it.
Eventually, my patient made a full recovery from his depression and started dating, though his parents’ absence in his life was never far from his thoughts.
No wonder. Research on early attachment, both in humans and in nonhuman primates, shows that we are hard-wired for bonding — even to those who aren’t very nice to us.
We also know that although prolonged childhood trauma can be toxic to the brain, adults retain the ability later in life to rewire their brains by new experience, including therapy and psychotropic medication.
For example, prolonged stress can kill cells in the hippocampus, a brain area critical for memory. The good news is that adults are able to grow new neurons in this area in the course of normal development. Also, antidepressants encourage the development of new cells in the hippocampus.
It is no stretch, then, to say that having a toxic parent may be harmful to a child’s brain, let alone his feelings. But that damage need not be written in stone.
Of course, we cannot undo history with therapy. But we can help mend brains and minds by removing or reducing stress.
Sometimes, as drastic as it sounds, that means letting go of a toxic parent.
Dr. Richard A. Friedman is a professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College.NYT-10/22/09
Sweden Looks to Diet to Cut Global Warming
Sweden Looks to Diet to Cut Global Warming
By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
Published: October 22, 2009
STOCKHOLM — Shopping for oatmeal, Helena Bergstrom, 37, admitted that she was flummoxed by the label on the blue box reading, “Climate declared: .87 kg CO2 per kg of roduct.”
This is the ninth in a series of articles about stopgap measures that could limit global warming. Future articles will address industry and cars.
“Right now, I don’t know what this means,” said Ms. Bergstrom, a pharmaceutical company employee.
But if a new experiment here succeeds, she and millions of other Swedes will soon find out. New labels listing thecarbon dioxide emissions associated with the production of foods, from whole wheat pasta to fast food burgers, are appearing on some grocery items and restaurant menus around the country.
People who live to eat might dismiss this as silly. But changing one’s diet can be as effective in reducing emissions of climate-changing gases as changing the car one drives or doing away with the clothes dryer, scientific experts say.
“We’re the first to do it, and it’s a new way of thinking for us,” said Ulf Bohman, head of the Nutrition Department at the Swedish National Food Administration, which was given the task last year of creating new food guidelinesgiving equal weight to climate and health. “We’re used to thinking about safety and nutrition as one thing and environmental as another.”
Some of the proposed new dietary guidelines, released over the summer, may seem startling to the uninitiated. They recommend that Swedes favor carrots over cucumbers and tomatoes, for example. (Unlike carrots, the latter two must be grown in heated greenhouses here, consuming energy.)
They are not counseled to eat more fish, despite the health benefits, because Europe’s stocks are depleted.
And somewhat less surprisingly, they are advised to substitute beans or chicken for red meat, in view of the heavy greenhouse gas emissions associated with raising cattle.
“For consumers, it’s hard,” Mr. Bohman acknowledged. “You are getting environmental advice that you have to coordinate with, ‘How can I eat healthier?’ ”
Many Swedish diners say it is just too much to ask. “I wish I could say that the information has made me change what I eat, but it hasn’t,” said Richard Lalander, 27, who was eating a Max hamburger (1.7 kilograms of carbon dioxide emissions) in the shadow of a menu board revealing that a chicken sandwich (0.4 kilograms) would have been better for the planet.
Yet if the new food guidelines were religiously heeded, some experts say, Sweden could cut its emissions from food production by 20 to 50 percent. An estimated 25 percent of the emissions produced by people in industrialized nations can be traced to the food they eat, according to recent research here. And foods vary enormously in the emissions released in their production.
While today’s American or European shoppers may be well versed in checking for nutrients, calories or fat content, they often have little idea of whether eating tomatoes, chicken or rice is good or bad for the climate.
Complicating matters, the emissions impact of, say, a carrot, can vary by a factor of 10, depending how and where it is grown.
Earlier studies of food emissions focused on the high environmental costs of transporting food and raising cattle. But more nuanced research shows that the emissions depend on many factors, including the type of soil used to grow the food and whether a dairy farmer uses local rapeseed or imported soy for cattle feed.
Business groups, farming cooperatives and organic labeling programs as well as the government have gamely come up with coordinated ways to identify food choices.
Max, Sweden’s largest homegrown chain of burger restaurants, now puts emissions calculations next to each item on its menu boards. Lantmannen, Sweden’s largest farming group, has begun placing precise labels on some categories of foods in grocery stores, including chicken, oatmeal, barley and pasta.
Consumers who pay attention may learn that emissions generated by growing the nation’s most popular grain, rice, are two to three times those of little-used barley, for example.
Some producers argue that the new programs are overly complex and threaten profits. The dietary recommendations, which are being circulated for comment not just in Sweden but across the European Union, have been attacked by the Continent’s meat industry, Norwegian salmon farmers and Malaysian palm oil growers, to name a few.
“This is trial and error; we’re still trying to see what works,” Mr. Bohman said.
Next year, KRAV, Scandinavia’s main organic certification program, will start requiring farmers to convert to low-emissions techniques if they want to display its coveted seal on products, meaning that most greenhouse tomatoes can no longer be called organic.
Those standards have stirred some protests. “There are farmers who are happy and farmers who say they are being ruined,” said Johan Cejie, manager of climate issues for KRAV.
For example, he said, farmers with high concentrations of peat soil on their property may no longer be able to grow carrots, since plowing peat releases huge amounts of carbon dioxide; to get the organic label, they may have to switch to feed crops that require no plowing.
Next year KRAV will require hothouses to use biofuels for heating. Dairy farms will have to obtain at least 70 percent of the food for their herds locally; many previously imported cheap soy from Brazil, generating transport emissions and damaging the rain forest as trees were cleared to make way for farmland.
The Swedish effort grew out of a 2005 study by Sweden’s national environmental agency on how personal consumption generates emissions. Researchers found that 25 percent of national per capita emissions — two metric tons per year — was attributable to eating.
The government realized that encouraging a diet that tilted more toward chicken or vegetables and educating farmers on lowering emissions generally could have an enormous impact.
Sweden has been a world leader in finding new ways to reduce emissions. It has vowed to eliminate the use of fossil fuel for electricity by 2020 and cars that run on gasoline by 2030.
To arrive at numbers for their company’s first carbon dioxide labels, scientists at Lantmannen analyzed life cycles of 20 products. These take into account emissions generated by fertilizer, fuel for harvesting machinery, packaging and transport.
They decided to examine one representative product in each category — say, pasta — rather than performing analyses for fusilli versus penne, or one brand versus another. “Every climate declaration is hugely time-intensive,” said Claes Johansson, Lantmannen’s director of sustainability.
A new generation of Swedish business leaders is stepping up to the climate challenge. Richard Bergfors, president of Max, his family’s burger chain, voluntarily hired a consultant to calculate its carbon footprint; 75 percent was created by its meat.
“We decided to be honest and put it all out there and say we’ll do everything we can to reduce,” said Mr. Bergfors, 40. In addition to putting emissions data on the menu, Max eliminated boxes from its children’s meals, installed low-energy LED lights and pays for wind-generated electricity.
Since the emissions counts started appearing on the menu, sales of climate-friendly items have risen 20 percent. Still, plenty of people head to a burger restaurant lusting only for a burger.
Kristian Eriksson, 26, an information technology specialist, looked embarrassed when asked about the burger he was eating at an outdoor table.
“You feel guilty picking red meat,” he said.
(Courtesy New York Times)
By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
Published: October 22, 2009
STOCKHOLM — Shopping for oatmeal, Helena Bergstrom, 37, admitted that she was flummoxed by the label on the blue box reading, “Climate declared: .87 kg CO2 per kg of roduct.”
This is the ninth in a series of articles about stopgap measures that could limit global warming. Future articles will address industry and cars.
“Right now, I don’t know what this means,” said Ms. Bergstrom, a pharmaceutical company employee.
But if a new experiment here succeeds, she and millions of other Swedes will soon find out. New labels listing thecarbon dioxide emissions associated with the production of foods, from whole wheat pasta to fast food burgers, are appearing on some grocery items and restaurant menus around the country.
People who live to eat might dismiss this as silly. But changing one’s diet can be as effective in reducing emissions of climate-changing gases as changing the car one drives or doing away with the clothes dryer, scientific experts say.
“We’re the first to do it, and it’s a new way of thinking for us,” said Ulf Bohman, head of the Nutrition Department at the Swedish National Food Administration, which was given the task last year of creating new food guidelinesgiving equal weight to climate and health. “We’re used to thinking about safety and nutrition as one thing and environmental as another.”
Some of the proposed new dietary guidelines, released over the summer, may seem startling to the uninitiated. They recommend that Swedes favor carrots over cucumbers and tomatoes, for example. (Unlike carrots, the latter two must be grown in heated greenhouses here, consuming energy.)
They are not counseled to eat more fish, despite the health benefits, because Europe’s stocks are depleted.
And somewhat less surprisingly, they are advised to substitute beans or chicken for red meat, in view of the heavy greenhouse gas emissions associated with raising cattle.
“For consumers, it’s hard,” Mr. Bohman acknowledged. “You are getting environmental advice that you have to coordinate with, ‘How can I eat healthier?’ ”
Many Swedish diners say it is just too much to ask. “I wish I could say that the information has made me change what I eat, but it hasn’t,” said Richard Lalander, 27, who was eating a Max hamburger (1.7 kilograms of carbon dioxide emissions) in the shadow of a menu board revealing that a chicken sandwich (0.4 kilograms) would have been better for the planet.
Yet if the new food guidelines were religiously heeded, some experts say, Sweden could cut its emissions from food production by 20 to 50 percent. An estimated 25 percent of the emissions produced by people in industrialized nations can be traced to the food they eat, according to recent research here. And foods vary enormously in the emissions released in their production.
While today’s American or European shoppers may be well versed in checking for nutrients, calories or fat content, they often have little idea of whether eating tomatoes, chicken or rice is good or bad for the climate.
Complicating matters, the emissions impact of, say, a carrot, can vary by a factor of 10, depending how and where it is grown.
Earlier studies of food emissions focused on the high environmental costs of transporting food and raising cattle. But more nuanced research shows that the emissions depend on many factors, including the type of soil used to grow the food and whether a dairy farmer uses local rapeseed or imported soy for cattle feed.
Business groups, farming cooperatives and organic labeling programs as well as the government have gamely come up with coordinated ways to identify food choices.
Max, Sweden’s largest homegrown chain of burger restaurants, now puts emissions calculations next to each item on its menu boards. Lantmannen, Sweden’s largest farming group, has begun placing precise labels on some categories of foods in grocery stores, including chicken, oatmeal, barley and pasta.
Consumers who pay attention may learn that emissions generated by growing the nation’s most popular grain, rice, are two to three times those of little-used barley, for example.
Some producers argue that the new programs are overly complex and threaten profits. The dietary recommendations, which are being circulated for comment not just in Sweden but across the European Union, have been attacked by the Continent’s meat industry, Norwegian salmon farmers and Malaysian palm oil growers, to name a few.
“This is trial and error; we’re still trying to see what works,” Mr. Bohman said.
Next year, KRAV, Scandinavia’s main organic certification program, will start requiring farmers to convert to low-emissions techniques if they want to display its coveted seal on products, meaning that most greenhouse tomatoes can no longer be called organic.
Those standards have stirred some protests. “There are farmers who are happy and farmers who say they are being ruined,” said Johan Cejie, manager of climate issues for KRAV.
For example, he said, farmers with high concentrations of peat soil on their property may no longer be able to grow carrots, since plowing peat releases huge amounts of carbon dioxide; to get the organic label, they may have to switch to feed crops that require no plowing.
Next year KRAV will require hothouses to use biofuels for heating. Dairy farms will have to obtain at least 70 percent of the food for their herds locally; many previously imported cheap soy from Brazil, generating transport emissions and damaging the rain forest as trees were cleared to make way for farmland.
The Swedish effort grew out of a 2005 study by Sweden’s national environmental agency on how personal consumption generates emissions. Researchers found that 25 percent of national per capita emissions — two metric tons per year — was attributable to eating.
The government realized that encouraging a diet that tilted more toward chicken or vegetables and educating farmers on lowering emissions generally could have an enormous impact.
Sweden has been a world leader in finding new ways to reduce emissions. It has vowed to eliminate the use of fossil fuel for electricity by 2020 and cars that run on gasoline by 2030.
To arrive at numbers for their company’s first carbon dioxide labels, scientists at Lantmannen analyzed life cycles of 20 products. These take into account emissions generated by fertilizer, fuel for harvesting machinery, packaging and transport.
They decided to examine one representative product in each category — say, pasta — rather than performing analyses for fusilli versus penne, or one brand versus another. “Every climate declaration is hugely time-intensive,” said Claes Johansson, Lantmannen’s director of sustainability.
A new generation of Swedish business leaders is stepping up to the climate challenge. Richard Bergfors, president of Max, his family’s burger chain, voluntarily hired a consultant to calculate its carbon footprint; 75 percent was created by its meat.
“We decided to be honest and put it all out there and say we’ll do everything we can to reduce,” said Mr. Bergfors, 40. In addition to putting emissions data on the menu, Max eliminated boxes from its children’s meals, installed low-energy LED lights and pays for wind-generated electricity.
Since the emissions counts started appearing on the menu, sales of climate-friendly items have risen 20 percent. Still, plenty of people head to a burger restaurant lusting only for a burger.
Kristian Eriksson, 26, an information technology specialist, looked embarrassed when asked about the burger he was eating at an outdoor table.
“You feel guilty picking red meat,” he said.
(Courtesy New York Times)
Geoengineering to mitigate climate change
Many scientists now support serious research into “geoengineering,” deliberate actions taken to slow or reverse global warming.
Of the various geoengi neering proposals, the ones that shade the earth from the sun could bring about the most immediate effects. But all of them have drawbacks and side effects that probably cannot be anticipated.
Pumping sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, as volcanoes do, is the most well established way to block the sun. Other proposals call for brightening clouds over the oceans by lofting sea salt into the atmosphere and building a sunscreen in space.
Enter "marine cloud brightening," a geoengineering scheme that would increase cloud reflectivity over the ocean by spraying them with an ultrafine saltwater mist from ships. The clouds, containing more particles, would cast enough sunlight back into space to at least partially offset the warming effects of all that CO2 from burning fossil fuels.
(Courtesy:Scientific American-Compiled by thrivikramji@gmail.com)
Of the various geoengi neering proposals, the ones that shade the earth from the sun could bring about the most immediate effects. But all of them have drawbacks and side effects that probably cannot be anticipated.
Pumping sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, as volcanoes do, is the most well established way to block the sun. Other proposals call for brightening clouds over the oceans by lofting sea salt into the atmosphere and building a sunscreen in space.
Enter "marine cloud brightening," a geoengineering scheme that would increase cloud reflectivity over the ocean by spraying them with an ultrafine saltwater mist from ships. The clouds, containing more particles, would cast enough sunlight back into space to at least partially offset the warming effects of all that CO2 from burning fossil fuels.
(Courtesy:Scientific American-Compiled by thrivikramji@gmail.com)
THE ARUVIKKARA RESERVOIR SAND MINING: POTENTIAL PUBLIC HEALTH HARMS
THE ARUVIKKARA RESERVOIR SAND MINING: POTENTIAL PUBLIC HEALTH HARMS
thrivikramji@gmail.com
1. The construction industry is at its lowest ebb, due to scarcity of fine aggregate or sand in the industry parlance. As a responsive government, the problem needs to be resolved to help the construction sector which is an area warranting great stimulus to get out of the recession due to global meltdown in Kerala.
So a wonderful idea has come up from the Aruvikkara Panchayath administration to remove the sediment in the reservoir, wash it clean of mud (particle <62.5 microns) and then sell at a reasonable profit so that employment and construction are saved in one shot. Obviously a very glamorous proposal
Unfortunately, the lay mind has seen only one side of the issue. At times of contingencies, this is the problem with the human mind. But for a trained mind like me, I see a variety of human issues arising out of the desilting of the reservoir at Aruvikkara, which is the only drinking water source for the greater Trivandrum area.
2. The questions begging answers are many. Say the question of disposal of contaminated water used for washing and removal of mud (silt+clay), which constitutes the lions share of (at least 75% or more) the reservoir sediment. How do we keep this water away from the water source we rely on for daily needs? Where would the remainder of sediment i.e., mud will go? Now, what about the re-released chemical ions (some of which are deleterious to human health and organic life in the waters)? Will they join the drinking water source in the reservoir or will be transported away by some mechanical means.
Though the boring was carried down to 5 or 6 meters in the sand bars in the channel, would anybody think of going down to such depths below the reservoir/water levels at any point in time using conventional methods and not suction dredging. Why in the world, after all, humans are employed to remove the sediment? The longer it takes for removal of sediment, the greater are the chances and risks of contamination of the drinking water of the reservoir.
3. The 80,000 m3 of sediment estimated tentatively cover all the size fractions or only the sand in the sediment? If it is the total accumulated stuff then 20-30% will be the sand component. Or sand fraction will be like 16,000 m3 (2666 tipper truck loads) to 24,000 m3 (4000 tipper truck loads) only.
Any process of desiltation should be using suction dredges which will cause only the least or minimum disturbance. Finally, is the sand reserve the only consideration among all others, when the waters are used for drinking water supply? Unless all these questions are answered scientifically, the Panchayat should be banned and prohibited from the desilting of the reservoir.
Finally has anybody looked into the worth gem-chrysoberyl (or Vaiduriyam) accumulated along with the sediment? Who will have the ultimate right on the Vaiduriyam.
Bit of History
The Wellingdon Water Works, the fore runner of the Trivandrum Water Supply System was operational like in the 1930”s. At the present Aruvikkara dam site, it was only a weir that had pooled the water for pumping to the processing plants and water supply in the city. Then came second five year plan, when a larger diameter cast iron pipe line was laid to augment the water supply to the town. Then, height of the weir was raised and finally shutters were built to regulate the through flow of the river to ensure drinking water for the city dwellers.
Sedimentation in the reservoir
Sediment accumulation in the reservoir is as much a reality as the reservoirs and dams. The difference is only in the degree. All along sediment has been acceleratedly accumulating in the reservoir, since the days of Wellindon Water Works. Enhanced sedimentation was primarily due to the location of the reservoir in the habited or populated area, with a cultivated catchment in the midland of Kerala, where primary pursuit of the people (landed and landless) were to cultivate Tapioca and other seasonal or annual crops.- the right ingredients for sediment loss from the prepared land and deposition in the reservoir pool.
Farming trends in the catchment.
Over the decades, the catchment of the Aruvikkara reservoir in the Karamana R. basin went through intense cultivation of rubber and tea and now with pineapple, seasonal vegetables etc. Undoubtedly, all these farms do make use of the biocides (some quite harmful) as well as chemical fertilizers. And the geochemistry has it that a large portion of it will join the waters as dissolved ions and finally to the reservoir, and in the reservoir sediment. Another portion however will escape the trap in the reservoir to reach the sea.
. . .
Dissolved ions in water and the problems
To the lay citizens what accumulates in the reservoir is only sediment which is more silt and clay (<62.5 micron in size) and very less sand (>62.5 micron) and perhaps only under 20-30% of all the sediment in the reservoir. In contrast, along with sediment, also transferred to the reservoir are several naturally supplied dissolved ions and human introduced chemical ions which are trapped and bound along with the fine sediment.
Yet another un-addressed aspect is the amplification of concentrations of the chemical ions in water, in the pore-water (i.e., water held in the inter-granular spaces of sediment particles) and finally in the finer sediment particles like silt and clay. The Unforeseen consequence is that when the sediment is disturbed, removed, washed and cleaned for meeting the need for sand or fine aggregate, the finer particle bound chemical ions are released and will join the waters, that we ultimately drink as well as it might mix with the through flow harming the waters down stream.
Summary
1. Thus the hidden trap in the proposition of the Aruvikkara Panchayat, is that it will release harming chemical ions to the drinking waters supplied in the city of Trivandrum, as well as in the waters that flow downstream of the dam. .
2. Scientific estimates of the potential sand reserve have not been made yet. Only the size of the reservoir fill is known and stands at 80,000 m3.
3. Generally only 20 to 30% of the fill is fine aggregate grade sediment. So until such estimates are made hold back the implementation. My own back of the envelope estimates show only 16,000-24,000 m3 of sand.
4. Unless plans for disposal of washed waste are designed wisely, do not jump into the process with 200 men and women with shovels and baskets - a method never to be implemented in a drinking water reservoir.
5. We need to worry about the type and nature of chemical ions trapped and bound on the fine sediment particles and the degree of harm they can do to people and the society. So make sure of the inert/safe nature of these ions before jumping into manual removal of reservoir sediment.
6. Firstly identify the locations for storage of the mud-separate coming off the washing process of reservoir sediment to obtain the salable sand. In other words 70 to 80 percent of 80,000 m3 needs to be disposed off with out harming the area and people and farmland for several decades to come.
7. Has the period for the manual removal of reservoir sediment been estimated and if so what is the duration? If it is carried out in summer where would one find water in large quantities for washing the sediment? Lastly, has any body thought of the potential of Vaiduriyam in the sediment and its worth?
-------------------------------------------
thrivikramji@gmail.com
1. The construction industry is at its lowest ebb, due to scarcity of fine aggregate or sand in the industry parlance. As a responsive government, the problem needs to be resolved to help the construction sector which is an area warranting great stimulus to get out of the recession due to global meltdown in Kerala.
So a wonderful idea has come up from the Aruvikkara Panchayath administration to remove the sediment in the reservoir, wash it clean of mud (particle <62.5 microns) and then sell at a reasonable profit so that employment and construction are saved in one shot. Obviously a very glamorous proposal
Unfortunately, the lay mind has seen only one side of the issue. At times of contingencies, this is the problem with the human mind. But for a trained mind like me, I see a variety of human issues arising out of the desilting of the reservoir at Aruvikkara, which is the only drinking water source for the greater Trivandrum area.
2. The questions begging answers are many. Say the question of disposal of contaminated water used for washing and removal of mud (silt+clay), which constitutes the lions share of (at least 75% or more) the reservoir sediment. How do we keep this water away from the water source we rely on for daily needs? Where would the remainder of sediment i.e., mud will go? Now, what about the re-released chemical ions (some of which are deleterious to human health and organic life in the waters)? Will they join the drinking water source in the reservoir or will be transported away by some mechanical means.
Though the boring was carried down to 5 or 6 meters in the sand bars in the channel, would anybody think of going down to such depths below the reservoir/water levels at any point in time using conventional methods and not suction dredging. Why in the world, after all, humans are employed to remove the sediment? The longer it takes for removal of sediment, the greater are the chances and risks of contamination of the drinking water of the reservoir.
3. The 80,000 m3 of sediment estimated tentatively cover all the size fractions or only the sand in the sediment? If it is the total accumulated stuff then 20-30% will be the sand component. Or sand fraction will be like 16,000 m3 (2666 tipper truck loads) to 24,000 m3 (4000 tipper truck loads) only.
Any process of desiltation should be using suction dredges which will cause only the least or minimum disturbance. Finally, is the sand reserve the only consideration among all others, when the waters are used for drinking water supply? Unless all these questions are answered scientifically, the Panchayat should be banned and prohibited from the desilting of the reservoir.
Finally has anybody looked into the worth gem-chrysoberyl (or Vaiduriyam) accumulated along with the sediment? Who will have the ultimate right on the Vaiduriyam.
Bit of History
The Wellingdon Water Works, the fore runner of the Trivandrum Water Supply System was operational like in the 1930”s. At the present Aruvikkara dam site, it was only a weir that had pooled the water for pumping to the processing plants and water supply in the city. Then came second five year plan, when a larger diameter cast iron pipe line was laid to augment the water supply to the town. Then, height of the weir was raised and finally shutters were built to regulate the through flow of the river to ensure drinking water for the city dwellers.
Sedimentation in the reservoir
Sediment accumulation in the reservoir is as much a reality as the reservoirs and dams. The difference is only in the degree. All along sediment has been acceleratedly accumulating in the reservoir, since the days of Wellindon Water Works. Enhanced sedimentation was primarily due to the location of the reservoir in the habited or populated area, with a cultivated catchment in the midland of Kerala, where primary pursuit of the people (landed and landless) were to cultivate Tapioca and other seasonal or annual crops.- the right ingredients for sediment loss from the prepared land and deposition in the reservoir pool.
Farming trends in the catchment.
Over the decades, the catchment of the Aruvikkara reservoir in the Karamana R. basin went through intense cultivation of rubber and tea and now with pineapple, seasonal vegetables etc. Undoubtedly, all these farms do make use of the biocides (some quite harmful) as well as chemical fertilizers. And the geochemistry has it that a large portion of it will join the waters as dissolved ions and finally to the reservoir, and in the reservoir sediment. Another portion however will escape the trap in the reservoir to reach the sea.
. . .
Dissolved ions in water and the problems
To the lay citizens what accumulates in the reservoir is only sediment which is more silt and clay (<62.5 micron in size) and very less sand (>62.5 micron) and perhaps only under 20-30% of all the sediment in the reservoir. In contrast, along with sediment, also transferred to the reservoir are several naturally supplied dissolved ions and human introduced chemical ions which are trapped and bound along with the fine sediment.
Yet another un-addressed aspect is the amplification of concentrations of the chemical ions in water, in the pore-water (i.e., water held in the inter-granular spaces of sediment particles) and finally in the finer sediment particles like silt and clay. The Unforeseen consequence is that when the sediment is disturbed, removed, washed and cleaned for meeting the need for sand or fine aggregate, the finer particle bound chemical ions are released and will join the waters, that we ultimately drink as well as it might mix with the through flow harming the waters down stream.
Summary
1. Thus the hidden trap in the proposition of the Aruvikkara Panchayat, is that it will release harming chemical ions to the drinking waters supplied in the city of Trivandrum, as well as in the waters that flow downstream of the dam. .
2. Scientific estimates of the potential sand reserve have not been made yet. Only the size of the reservoir fill is known and stands at 80,000 m3.
3. Generally only 20 to 30% of the fill is fine aggregate grade sediment. So until such estimates are made hold back the implementation. My own back of the envelope estimates show only 16,000-24,000 m3 of sand.
4. Unless plans for disposal of washed waste are designed wisely, do not jump into the process with 200 men and women with shovels and baskets - a method never to be implemented in a drinking water reservoir.
5. We need to worry about the type and nature of chemical ions trapped and bound on the fine sediment particles and the degree of harm they can do to people and the society. So make sure of the inert/safe nature of these ions before jumping into manual removal of reservoir sediment.
6. Firstly identify the locations for storage of the mud-separate coming off the washing process of reservoir sediment to obtain the salable sand. In other words 70 to 80 percent of 80,000 m3 needs to be disposed off with out harming the area and people and farmland for several decades to come.
7. Has the period for the manual removal of reservoir sediment been estimated and if so what is the duration? If it is carried out in summer where would one find water in large quantities for washing the sediment? Lastly, has any body thought of the potential of Vaiduriyam in the sediment and its worth?
-------------------------------------------
MINING OF SEA BED SAND: ANOTHER POINT OF VIEW.
MINING OF SEA BED SAND: ANOTHER POINT OF VIEW.
Introduction
The ingenuity of man always had motivated him to explore the nature to locate usable commodities for the sustenance of humanity and hence of civilization. Recent idea of gathering construction grade fine aggregate or sand from the seabed in the continental shelf is one of those. It is not at all a new idea any way. We all now know that several island nations as well as others have been gathering sand for application in the concrete or cement mortar. In this article I will examine briefly the feasibility of the proposition from a geological stand point – most often ignored point. In a very short time, the public mindset in Kerala got sharply divided into one of the two camps, viz., the protagonists and the antagonists.
Any construction using cement concrete and steel calls in what are called in industry circles, as coarse and fine aggregates. As far as the former is concerned, there is no great confusion as to the types or sources, by the sheer knowledge that natural processes of weathering of rocks and erosion and transport do not produce it. Thus, obvious and uncontroversial recourse had been and is from a rock-crushing-sizing plant. Contrary to this, the fine aggregate (= commercially designated as sand) used to be sourced and gathered from the modern and ancient river channels, shallow sea bed in the inner shelf as well as provinces away from the riverine or shelf sources, from the crusher tailings (after screening). With out a geo-scientific knowledge of origin of sea sand, its mining scenario may run into sentiment and emotion ridden realms and unrealities.
Geological background
Truly, quantities of sand sized quartz (a primary constituent of commonest surface rocks like gneisses and granite with a share of only 30% by volume and a mineral of chemical and physical neutrality to cement) is under transport in the stream channels, from the erosion rocks and soils (disaggregated by chemical weathering). Further, this sand has many temporary storages like in the channels as sand bars of various types, in the flood plains, in the abandoned channels etc.
Unfortunately not only that we exhausted the all of stream channel sand as result of the construction boom in the last decades, but ecologically and physically killed all the rivers themselves for ever (in human terms), by the continuing the sanction to gather sand to the local bodies under the three tier panchayats. River sources its sand immediately from the soil only, and majority of us do not know that a meter of soil needs at least a million years to form, and in an in situ soil, sand sized quartz is just about 20 to 30 percent. Hence the rate of sand production is an extremely slow process.
In addition, sand that reaches the sea bed is again worked by the wave and tide generated currents and gradually transported beach ward to be deposited there sometimes permanently. Like in many beaches of Kerala, sand that accumulated in the beach face is eroded and shifted massively to the inshore to be stored in the in shore as longshore submarine bars, and to be slowly re-deposited in the beach any way.
Due to the large scale fluctuations of sea level, in the Pleistocene, the shorelines of the continents including that of India stood several 10s meters ( for India 100 m.) below the present shoreline, forcing the rivers draining the continents to traverse through longer courses (along the modern continental shelf) and depositing the sand there. This scenario is unfortunately not in the knowledge base of lay citizens or the non-specialists - hence, all the hue and cry fouling the air.
Data - State of the art
. The most productive shelf region of Kerala, is rather vast and stands at 22400 Km2 (length 560 Km and width of shelf ~ 40Km) or 20,000 Km2 - to strike conservative figure. As a marine geologist, I say that there exists a considerably large quantum of reliable data with the NIO, MW of GSI and some others, indicating the earlier lower stands of sea level and hence of the past shoreline elevations. Mapping of the sandy sediment in the seabed can be taken up by shallow geophysical and geological work, in order to isolate potential areas for commercial dredging. The dredged can be primarily washed in seawater, and later on further washed in fresh water and not exactly drinking standard water. More over the special cement that would accommodate mildly salty sand will go along way in reducing the water use by this process.
We often ignore, vastness of the resources of the continental shelf - living and non-living and renewable to varying degrees (including sea bed sediment of a decameter or two in depth), which is so large in proportion to the land based resources, due to the very sheer size of the sea bed. We have been gathering large quantities of the living resources of the oceanic realm to complement our (sea) food needs. Large hue and cry is expressly unheard of about this issue, as it supports and contributes to the gastronomic needs and also to the GDP. On top of this we also believe in the ability of the species to regenerate.
I might state that the sandy-mud or the gravelly-sandy-mud (containing black minerals in certain parts off Kerala, and certain other continents) covering sea bed – a non-living resource in the conventional sense- is only forming at very low rate day, but were supplied to the seabed by the west flowing rivers - large and small draining the continental-scape – in the Quaternary or say during the last 1.8 million yr. BP. Therefore it is wise to be able to keep an inventory of all the viable sources of the raw materials useful to mankind. This is only commonsensical any way. The question of express exploitation comes only as the close second.
Numbers game
With the geological background of the sea bed, rate of soil formation and erosion and transport process, weathering of rocks, rock composition and hence nature of sediment cover, some volume estimates essential to fully appreciate the science of sea sand mining. Given a land area of 38863 Km2 for Kerala, it is possible to estimate the size of the sand content (in the sea bed sediment), for a source slab of uniform thickness of 1.0 m., and quartz sand content of 30% and Sp.Gr. of 2.65. By weathering and erosion, this slab ought to yield quartz laden sediment headed to the sea to the west.
Estimated sand content of this slab is (30.89 e12 Tons) 30 Trillion Tons By the way the same slab also would have an ilmenite (Sp.Gr. of 4.2 and abundance of 1.0%) content of (1.632 e12) or say 1.5 Trillion tons.
These estimates consider the land-river-sea system as a closed system (which is more or less true), uniform character for the basement rocks and expressly no rate of erosion. If we allow the entire Pleistocene to be the period of erosion, it is well over 1.8 Million years – more than what is essential for the formation of 1.0 M of soil. This exercise is carried out only to broaden the realities of the sand content of the sea bed.
Certainly post depositional sediment transport by currents generated by waves and tides would have further redistributed the sand with on the sea bed at preferred sites and forms to be discovered by mapping by appropriate tools available to marine geoscientists to day.
Unfortunately, some data or facts (and not the science per se) of geo-science are very simple to be appreciated by the non-specialist and the layman alike. Most of the time such people, become highly opinionated just for the fun of being one (?). In the case of sea sand also we face such a dilemma. Obviously, these are truly proven to be true by sea bed mapping and exploration, and then one can finally provide an alternate source for the sand starved construction industry.
--------
Introduction
The ingenuity of man always had motivated him to explore the nature to locate usable commodities for the sustenance of humanity and hence of civilization. Recent idea of gathering construction grade fine aggregate or sand from the seabed in the continental shelf is one of those. It is not at all a new idea any way. We all now know that several island nations as well as others have been gathering sand for application in the concrete or cement mortar. In this article I will examine briefly the feasibility of the proposition from a geological stand point – most often ignored point. In a very short time, the public mindset in Kerala got sharply divided into one of the two camps, viz., the protagonists and the antagonists.
Any construction using cement concrete and steel calls in what are called in industry circles, as coarse and fine aggregates. As far as the former is concerned, there is no great confusion as to the types or sources, by the sheer knowledge that natural processes of weathering of rocks and erosion and transport do not produce it. Thus, obvious and uncontroversial recourse had been and is from a rock-crushing-sizing plant. Contrary to this, the fine aggregate (= commercially designated as sand) used to be sourced and gathered from the modern and ancient river channels, shallow sea bed in the inner shelf as well as provinces away from the riverine or shelf sources, from the crusher tailings (after screening). With out a geo-scientific knowledge of origin of sea sand, its mining scenario may run into sentiment and emotion ridden realms and unrealities.
Geological background
Truly, quantities of sand sized quartz (a primary constituent of commonest surface rocks like gneisses and granite with a share of only 30% by volume and a mineral of chemical and physical neutrality to cement) is under transport in the stream channels, from the erosion rocks and soils (disaggregated by chemical weathering). Further, this sand has many temporary storages like in the channels as sand bars of various types, in the flood plains, in the abandoned channels etc.
Unfortunately not only that we exhausted the all of stream channel sand as result of the construction boom in the last decades, but ecologically and physically killed all the rivers themselves for ever (in human terms), by the continuing the sanction to gather sand to the local bodies under the three tier panchayats. River sources its sand immediately from the soil only, and majority of us do not know that a meter of soil needs at least a million years to form, and in an in situ soil, sand sized quartz is just about 20 to 30 percent. Hence the rate of sand production is an extremely slow process.
In addition, sand that reaches the sea bed is again worked by the wave and tide generated currents and gradually transported beach ward to be deposited there sometimes permanently. Like in many beaches of Kerala, sand that accumulated in the beach face is eroded and shifted massively to the inshore to be stored in the in shore as longshore submarine bars, and to be slowly re-deposited in the beach any way.
Due to the large scale fluctuations of sea level, in the Pleistocene, the shorelines of the continents including that of India stood several 10s meters ( for India 100 m.) below the present shoreline, forcing the rivers draining the continents to traverse through longer courses (along the modern continental shelf) and depositing the sand there. This scenario is unfortunately not in the knowledge base of lay citizens or the non-specialists - hence, all the hue and cry fouling the air.
Data - State of the art
. The most productive shelf region of Kerala, is rather vast and stands at 22400 Km2 (length 560 Km and width of shelf ~ 40Km) or 20,000 Km2 - to strike conservative figure. As a marine geologist, I say that there exists a considerably large quantum of reliable data with the NIO, MW of GSI and some others, indicating the earlier lower stands of sea level and hence of the past shoreline elevations. Mapping of the sandy sediment in the seabed can be taken up by shallow geophysical and geological work, in order to isolate potential areas for commercial dredging. The dredged can be primarily washed in seawater, and later on further washed in fresh water and not exactly drinking standard water. More over the special cement that would accommodate mildly salty sand will go along way in reducing the water use by this process.
We often ignore, vastness of the resources of the continental shelf - living and non-living and renewable to varying degrees (including sea bed sediment of a decameter or two in depth), which is so large in proportion to the land based resources, due to the very sheer size of the sea bed. We have been gathering large quantities of the living resources of the oceanic realm to complement our (sea) food needs. Large hue and cry is expressly unheard of about this issue, as it supports and contributes to the gastronomic needs and also to the GDP. On top of this we also believe in the ability of the species to regenerate.
I might state that the sandy-mud or the gravelly-sandy-mud (containing black minerals in certain parts off Kerala, and certain other continents) covering sea bed – a non-living resource in the conventional sense- is only forming at very low rate day, but were supplied to the seabed by the west flowing rivers - large and small draining the continental-scape – in the Quaternary or say during the last 1.8 million yr. BP. Therefore it is wise to be able to keep an inventory of all the viable sources of the raw materials useful to mankind. This is only commonsensical any way. The question of express exploitation comes only as the close second.
Numbers game
With the geological background of the sea bed, rate of soil formation and erosion and transport process, weathering of rocks, rock composition and hence nature of sediment cover, some volume estimates essential to fully appreciate the science of sea sand mining. Given a land area of 38863 Km2 for Kerala, it is possible to estimate the size of the sand content (in the sea bed sediment), for a source slab of uniform thickness of 1.0 m., and quartz sand content of 30% and Sp.Gr. of 2.65. By weathering and erosion, this slab ought to yield quartz laden sediment headed to the sea to the west.
Estimated sand content of this slab is (30.89 e12 Tons) 30 Trillion Tons By the way the same slab also would have an ilmenite (Sp.Gr. of 4.2 and abundance of 1.0%) content of (1.632 e12) or say 1.5 Trillion tons.
These estimates consider the land-river-sea system as a closed system (which is more or less true), uniform character for the basement rocks and expressly no rate of erosion. If we allow the entire Pleistocene to be the period of erosion, it is well over 1.8 Million years – more than what is essential for the formation of 1.0 M of soil. This exercise is carried out only to broaden the realities of the sand content of the sea bed.
Certainly post depositional sediment transport by currents generated by waves and tides would have further redistributed the sand with on the sea bed at preferred sites and forms to be discovered by mapping by appropriate tools available to marine geoscientists to day.
Unfortunately, some data or facts (and not the science per se) of geo-science are very simple to be appreciated by the non-specialist and the layman alike. Most of the time such people, become highly opinionated just for the fun of being one (?). In the case of sea sand also we face such a dilemma. Obviously, these are truly proven to be true by sea bed mapping and exploration, and then one can finally provide an alternate source for the sand starved construction industry.
--------
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Theraputic Yoga
Therapeutic Value of Yoga
B.Padmanabha Pillai, M.A.
Director of Yoga (Rtd.)
Trivandrum
(14—5—1983)
Normal functions of our body go on uninterrupted as long as our brain, heart, intestine etc., discharge their duties with out any defect. These are internal organs. They function by the autonomous nervous system. The subtle centers of the brain, circulatory system, respiratory system, and digestive system are working with out our knowledge as long as our health is nortmal.It is the involuntary nervous system that governs the automatic functions such as heart beat, peristaltic action of the intestine, circulation of blood, contraction and expansion of lungs, and kidneys and secretions from the endocrine glands. The above works are carried out with out the knowledge of the individual.But the presence of the organic function is noticed when the internal organs are strained due to some disease. The difficulty in the discharge of duties of the internal organs is traced as the cause of disease, when examined by an experienced physician.
Wrong habits are mostly the causes that create disease of the body. Spending sleepless nights, working without rest, inadequate food, hard labor etc., result in diseases like ulcer, asthma, gas trouble, diabetes, blood pressure and so on.There are many modern medicines newly discovered like anti-biotic pills and sulfa drugs which produce speedy action. Most people accept this treatment because it works on the molecular level, giving miraculous improvement with ib a short period.Most of the people are not patient enough to accept the old method working in the organs as it might take a long time to get a complete cure.
Though modern medicines show immediate results of improvement very few care to see that it undermines the intelligence of organs where by such diseases in the long run get immune to such medicines. It is in such cases that yoga therapy succeeds. This is because of the fact that we get in touch with higher consciousness of the body that controls the intelligence of the organs in the lower level. The secret of the functional divisions between the higher and lower centers has been found out by the sages of old. Th organic function of the lower level is controlled by prana ( the energy in the nervous system) in the higher level of consciousness.
This has been the result of the evolutionary process, of the body from the very ancient times.
By understanding the principle of the above connection, the yogis formulated a system which includes yogasanas, mudras, kriyas, bandhas, and pranayama. By these methods one can purify the body in its physical aspects, as well as develop the capacity in the higher levels, of consciousness.
Now let us examine how this relationship between the higher level of consciousness and the lower level of nervous system work as remedy to disease. It is here that the rhythmic and controlled system of breathing, otherwise known as pranayama is introduced, as a sure remedy to become immune to diseases. It helps to improve the resistance power, whereby the emotional stability of the organs, is regulated finally allowing the mind to keep the body at rest.
In preliminary stages it starts with some purification process like kapalabathy, Brahmamudra and agnimudra. Kapalabathy will purify the track, viz., nose, pharynx, larynx, tracheae and bronchi, and the alveolar duct to perform the practice of conscious breathing. easily. This purification process will open up the clogged nasal passages, and clears the sinuses of the mucus. This is a sure remedy for sinusitis early stages of tonsillitis, perpetual sneezing and perpetual cold.
By conscious breathing the nerve centers, situated in the medulla oblongata generates the stimulus that carries, the impulse to the muscles of the respiratory system, the diaphragm, and the intercostal muscles. This creates an introspective impulse originating in the cervical nerve roots. This impulse causes rhythmic contraction of the diaphragm. The chest cavity is increased to create more space with in the rib cage. This helps the elastic lungs to expand to contain more oxygen. There is saying that that every pinch oxygen will create a new molecule. This is how rejuvenation is affected in the body cells, where by the resistance power, is regained.
Agnisarakriya is an important remedy for ailments in the digestive system. The alimentary canal consists of stomach, duodenum, small and large intestines. Food passes through the track by means of a progressive contractual motion called peristalsis. The action caused by the involuntary muscular action is revitalized by the practice of agnisarakriya. Diseases like gastritis, colitis and other troubles due to ingestion of poison through food or bad diet are caused by slowing down or stopping of peristalsis in certain portions of the digestive system. Inflammation of any type can be cured by administration of medicine. But this does not necessarily reintroduce efficient peristaltic action. It is here that agnisarakriya help to revitalize the intelligence of the organ.
For normal happiness every body should follow a “yoga way of life”. For every facet of life, physical, mental and spiritual are being taken care of. The methods of achieving the well being have been explained in the writings of yogis of the past. Despite the great advancement in the fields of culture and civilization and development in the branches of science, technology and industry the welfare of the people and the consequent happiness of the individual have largely been ignored. Neglected and forfeited. Corruption, insecurity, violence and environmental abuse and economic depression have become a part of every day life. Discussions on the world problems, seminars and plans for major projects have brought only limited progress. The way and need for disciplined life have been pushed back. This has to be awakened only by a change in the consciousness in the individual. The problems of the individual and society are closely interwoven, Unless reasonable improvement is achieved, in the quality of individual life will never be happy. Living “a yoga way of life “ is the only remedy for that.
We speak of freedom. The real freedom lies in the soul. Individual soul ultimately unites with the universal The word yoga means yoke, to join. It comes from the Sanskrit word, yug – to join. This union of individual soul with the universal soul is called yoga. Good habits, physical exercises and spirit of services, faith and devotion will lead to mental and spiritual exercises which will end in the emancipation of the soul – the ultimate aim of life.
.
B.Padmanabha Pillai, M.A.
Director of Yoga (Rtd.)
Trivandrum
(14—5—1983)
Normal functions of our body go on uninterrupted as long as our brain, heart, intestine etc., discharge their duties with out any defect. These are internal organs. They function by the autonomous nervous system. The subtle centers of the brain, circulatory system, respiratory system, and digestive system are working with out our knowledge as long as our health is nortmal.It is the involuntary nervous system that governs the automatic functions such as heart beat, peristaltic action of the intestine, circulation of blood, contraction and expansion of lungs, and kidneys and secretions from the endocrine glands. The above works are carried out with out the knowledge of the individual.But the presence of the organic function is noticed when the internal organs are strained due to some disease. The difficulty in the discharge of duties of the internal organs is traced as the cause of disease, when examined by an experienced physician.
Wrong habits are mostly the causes that create disease of the body. Spending sleepless nights, working without rest, inadequate food, hard labor etc., result in diseases like ulcer, asthma, gas trouble, diabetes, blood pressure and so on.There are many modern medicines newly discovered like anti-biotic pills and sulfa drugs which produce speedy action. Most people accept this treatment because it works on the molecular level, giving miraculous improvement with ib a short period.Most of the people are not patient enough to accept the old method working in the organs as it might take a long time to get a complete cure.
Though modern medicines show immediate results of improvement very few care to see that it undermines the intelligence of organs where by such diseases in the long run get immune to such medicines. It is in such cases that yoga therapy succeeds. This is because of the fact that we get in touch with higher consciousness of the body that controls the intelligence of the organs in the lower level. The secret of the functional divisions between the higher and lower centers has been found out by the sages of old. Th organic function of the lower level is controlled by prana ( the energy in the nervous system) in the higher level of consciousness.
This has been the result of the evolutionary process, of the body from the very ancient times.
By understanding the principle of the above connection, the yogis formulated a system which includes yogasanas, mudras, kriyas, bandhas, and pranayama. By these methods one can purify the body in its physical aspects, as well as develop the capacity in the higher levels, of consciousness.
Now let us examine how this relationship between the higher level of consciousness and the lower level of nervous system work as remedy to disease. It is here that the rhythmic and controlled system of breathing, otherwise known as pranayama is introduced, as a sure remedy to become immune to diseases. It helps to improve the resistance power, whereby the emotional stability of the organs, is regulated finally allowing the mind to keep the body at rest.
In preliminary stages it starts with some purification process like kapalabathy, Brahmamudra and agnimudra. Kapalabathy will purify the track, viz., nose, pharynx, larynx, tracheae and bronchi, and the alveolar duct to perform the practice of conscious breathing. easily. This purification process will open up the clogged nasal passages, and clears the sinuses of the mucus. This is a sure remedy for sinusitis early stages of tonsillitis, perpetual sneezing and perpetual cold.
By conscious breathing the nerve centers, situated in the medulla oblongata generates the stimulus that carries, the impulse to the muscles of the respiratory system, the diaphragm, and the intercostal muscles. This creates an introspective impulse originating in the cervical nerve roots. This impulse causes rhythmic contraction of the diaphragm. The chest cavity is increased to create more space with in the rib cage. This helps the elastic lungs to expand to contain more oxygen. There is saying that that every pinch oxygen will create a new molecule. This is how rejuvenation is affected in the body cells, where by the resistance power, is regained.
Agnisarakriya is an important remedy for ailments in the digestive system. The alimentary canal consists of stomach, duodenum, small and large intestines. Food passes through the track by means of a progressive contractual motion called peristalsis. The action caused by the involuntary muscular action is revitalized by the practice of agnisarakriya. Diseases like gastritis, colitis and other troubles due to ingestion of poison through food or bad diet are caused by slowing down or stopping of peristalsis in certain portions of the digestive system. Inflammation of any type can be cured by administration of medicine. But this does not necessarily reintroduce efficient peristaltic action. It is here that agnisarakriya help to revitalize the intelligence of the organ.
For normal happiness every body should follow a “yoga way of life”. For every facet of life, physical, mental and spiritual are being taken care of. The methods of achieving the well being have been explained in the writings of yogis of the past. Despite the great advancement in the fields of culture and civilization and development in the branches of science, technology and industry the welfare of the people and the consequent happiness of the individual have largely been ignored. Neglected and forfeited. Corruption, insecurity, violence and environmental abuse and economic depression have become a part of every day life. Discussions on the world problems, seminars and plans for major projects have brought only limited progress. The way and need for disciplined life have been pushed back. This has to be awakened only by a change in the consciousness in the individual. The problems of the individual and society are closely interwoven, Unless reasonable improvement is achieved, in the quality of individual life will never be happy. Living “a yoga way of life “ is the only remedy for that.
We speak of freedom. The real freedom lies in the soul. Individual soul ultimately unites with the universal The word yoga means yoke, to join. It comes from the Sanskrit word, yug – to join. This union of individual soul with the universal soul is called yoga. Good habits, physical exercises and spirit of services, faith and devotion will lead to mental and spiritual exercises which will end in the emancipation of the soul – the ultimate aim of life.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
